How do I improve sepsis bundle compliance?
CMS SEP-1 sepsis bundle compliance requires blood cultures, lactate measurement, and broad-spectrum antibiotics within specific time windows. National compliance averages 55%. The most common failure point is the 3-hour lactate reorder requirement — missed in 34% of non-compliant cases because it requires a manual re-order rather than automatic re-testing. Automated time-zero flagging in clinical data reduces bundle failures by 40–50%.
What this looks like in Vizier
Stylized dashboard visualization. Data values obscured. Upload your own data to see real numbers.
Why This Happens
Each SEP-1 bundle element has a distinct failure mode. Blood cultures before antibiotics are missed in 12% of cases because antibiotics are initiated in the ED — often appropriately, given clinical acuity — before the culture order is placed. This sequence inversion invalidates the bundle for CMS reporting purposes even if clinical care was appropriate. Initial lactate measurement is completed in 88% of cases nationally, making it the most reliably executed element. However, the required lactate reorder — mandatory within 2 hours when the initial result exceeds 2 mmol/L — is missed in 34% of those cases because it requires a separate, manually placed order in the EHR rather than an automatic repeat test. This is a workflow design problem, not a clinical awareness problem.
Antibiotic timing failure (15% of cases nationally) is driven by pharmacy queue delays rather than prescribing delays. The mean time from antibiotic order to pharmacy dispensing is 38 minutes at facilities without a sepsis antibiotic preparation priority protocol. During high-volume periods, this time extends to 60–90 minutes, pushing total time-to-antibiotic beyond the 3-hour window. Time-zero identification — determining when the clinical presentation first met sepsis criteria — is the most contested methodological issue in SEP-1 compliance, because retrospective chart review frequently places time-zero later than real-time identification would have, compressing the documented window and making compliance appear worse than it was.
What the Data Usually Hides
SEP-1 compliance is typically reported as pass/fail for the complete bundle. A patient who completes five of six elements scores identically in the aggregate compliance rate as a patient who completes zero of six elements. This binary reporting means that element-level failure analysis — the data required to identify which specific process steps are failing — requires separate extraction from the SEP-1 abstraction database. Most facilities with below-average compliance are failing on one or two specific elements, not performing poorly across the board.
Time-zero documentation is frequently incomplete or inconsistent, creating two problems: it makes compliance calculation unreliable (clinical staff dispute bundle failure flags that were generated from incorrect time-zero data), and it removes the ability to calculate actual time-to-treatment windows. Facilities that implement prospective time-zero identification — flagging sepsis criteria in real time using automated screening tools rather than retrospective chart review — find that their compliance rates initially appear to decrease because more cases are captured, but mortality outcomes improve because more patients receive timely treatment.
How to Fix It
Implement a real-time SEP-1 checklist embedded in the ED and inpatient clinical workflow that fires when a patient meets SIRS criteria or is flagged by a sepsis screening algorithm. The checklist should display each bundle element with completion status, timestamp, and time remaining in the compliance window. Making the bundle window visible in real time — rather than discoverable only through retrospective review — is the primary mechanism of the 40–50% compliance improvement associated with automated flagging.
Address the lactate reorder failure specifically with a clinical decision rule: if initial lactate result is greater than 2 mmol/L, generate an automatic 2-hour alert to the ordering provider requiring either a reorder or a documented reason for deferral. This workflow change addresses the most common single point of bundle failure without requiring changes to any other element. For antibiotic timing, implement a sepsis antibiotic preparation priority protocol with pharmacy — a verbal or electronic escalation trigger that moves sepsis antibiotic preparation to the front of the dispensing queue. Facilities that implement this protocol achieve mean time-to-antibiotic of 22 minutes from order to dispensing, compared to 38 minutes with standard queue processing.
Your Data. Your Answer.
This is what the data typically shows.
Want to see what your data says?
Ask Your Vizier →