Dermatology Analytics

Dermatology Practice Analytics: Biopsy Tracking, Procedure Mix, and Prior Auth Burden

Biologic prior authorization for psoriasis and atopic dermatitis takes 2-6 weeks and varies dramatically by payer and medication. Dermatology practices need analytics on approval rates by payer and drug to predict success, prepare appeals, and manage the administrative cost of prior auth burden.

See Dermatology Demo →
2–6 weeksbiologic prior authorization timeline — practices without approval rate analytics appeal blindly
The Data Challenge in Dermatology

Biopsy Volume, Mohs Efficiency, Biologic Approval Rates, and Cosmetic Revenue Each Live in a Different Data Silo.

Dermatology practice analytics span a uniquely wide range: skin cancer detection and biopsy management, Mohs micrographic surgery operational efficiency, chronic disease management with high-cost biologic therapies, and elective cosmetic procedures — all under one practice roof. Each of these revenue streams has different analytics needs, different quality metrics, and different payer dynamics. A practice running all four without cross-referencing data is making scheduling, staffing, and financial decisions on incomplete information.

Biopsy management analytics are among the highest-stakes tracking needs in outpatient medicine. A pathology result that is not followed up — a melanoma or squamous cell carcinoma that falls through the workflow — creates serious patient safety risk and malpractice liability. Tracking biopsy volume by provider, pathology turnaround time (target under 7 business days), and the follow-up completion rate for malignant results is the foundational quality metric in dermatology. Most practices track this in paper logbooks or in a spreadsheet that the MA maintains.

Biologic prior authorization analytics are increasingly critical as dermatology has become one of the highest biologic prescribing specialties. Dupilumab for moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis, IL-17 and IL-23 inhibitors for plaque psoriasis (secukinumab, ixekizumab, risankizumab, guselkumab), and anti-IgE therapy — each requires prior authorization from commercial and Medicare Part D payers with different step therapy and documentation requirements. A practice that knows which payers approve which medications on first submission vs. which require appeals can optimize the prescribing and documentation workflow to reduce the administrative burden on both staff and patients.

Biopsy Malignancy Rate and Follow-Up Tracking
Biopsy volume by provider and body site, pathology turnaround time trending, benign vs. malignant result distribution, and malignant result follow-up completion tracking. Identify pathology results more than 7 business days old with no follow-up documented — before they become a patient safety event.
Mohs Surgery Efficiency Analytics
Mohs case volume by indication (BCC, SCC, melanoma in situ), stages-per-case average by tumor type and anatomical site, repair type distribution (primary closure, flap, graft, referred reconstruction). Average stages-per-case trending identifies whether case selection criteria are appropriate or whether higher-stage cases indicate patient selection opportunities.
Biologic Prior Auth Approval Rate by Payer
Prior authorization submission, approval, denial, and appeal outcome by biologic medication and payer. Which payers approve dupilumab on first submission for atopic dermatitis? Which require step therapy with topical agents first? This data enables practices to predict approval probability and prepare documentation proactively.
What Vizier Tracks

Dermatology-Specific Analytics Capabilities

Biopsy and Pathology Analytics
Biopsy volume by provider and anatomical site, pathology lab turnaround time (target <7 business days), malignancy rate distribution, and follow-up completion tracking for malignant and pre-malignant results.
Mohs Surgery Metrics
Case volume by tumor type and anatomical site, stages-per-case average with trending, repair type distribution, and appropriate case selection analysis by indication. Identify cases where stage count is systematically above or below specialty benchmarks.
$
Medical vs. Cosmetic Revenue Mix
Revenue by service category (medical dermatology, Mohs, cosmetic), production by visit type, and cosmetic procedure utilization trends. Cosmetic revenue as percentage of total practice revenue — tracked by provider and by location for multi-site groups.
Biologic Prior Auth Analytics
Prior authorization volume by medication (dupilumab, secukinumab, risankizumab, ixekizumab, guselkumab) and payer. First-submission approval rate, denial rate, appeal success rate. DLQI (Dermatology Life Quality Index) documentation rates for biologic eligibility qualification.
Biosimilar Adoption Tracking
Reference biologic vs. biosimilar prescribing rates in dermatology — adalimumab biosimilars for psoriasis patients on biologics, ustekinumab biosimilars. Payer formulary status by biosimilar product and step therapy requirement documentation.
Cosmetic Procedure Analytics
Botulinum toxin units per session by provider, filler volume and product mix, phototherapy and laser procedure frequency, and cosmetic revenue per patient visit. Repeat cosmetic patient retention rate — a key indicator of cosmetic program profitability.
Quality Programs & Reporting

Dermatology Quality Reporting Requirements

MIPS quality measures for dermatology include melanoma appropriate management (biopsy reporting), psoriasis treatment plan documentation, and DLQI documentation for biologic therapy candidates. The American Academy of Dermatology (AAD) maintains the DataDerm registry — a qualified clinical data registry for MIPS reporting that includes dermatology-specific quality measures including skin cancer screening counseling, follow-up for biopsied skin lesions, and psoriasis activity assessment (DLQI and PASI scoring).

The Prior Authorization Reform Act and state-level PA legislation increasingly require payers to provide real-time decisions for urgent PA requests. Dermatology practices that track payer PA performance data are better positioned to advocate for formulary changes with payer medical directors and to document the administrative burden of PA requirements for advocacy with state insurance commissioners.

MIPS Quality Measures
Melanoma appropriate management, psoriasis DLQI documentation, follow-up for biopsied skin lesions, skin cancer counseling, biologic therapy PASI and DLQI baseline documentation
Clinical Registries
AAD DataDerm registry (MIPS qualified clinical data registry), ACCME dermatology CME reporting, Mohs College quality metrics
Biologic Monitoring
REMS program compliance for biologics with risk management programs, biosimilar interchangeability tracking, DLQI and PASI score documentation for continued biologic authorization
Payment Considerations
Medical vs. cosmetic billing separation (cosmetic services not covered by insurance), biologic buy-and-bill vs. specialty pharmacy, Mohs CPT code complexity billing (17311-17315)
Dermatology Analytics

Track Every Biopsy, Every Biologic Auth, Every Mohs Stage in One Platform

Upload your EHR, pathology, and billing data — ask 'which payers have the highest first-submission denial rate for dupilumab prescriptions?' — and get the answer to inform your PA strategy before the next submission.