Month-End Reporting Shows You What Already Happened
The standard revenue cycle reporting model is retrospective: your billing team compiles denials at month-end, identifies the patterns, escalates to coding or clinical staff, and waits for next month to see if anything changed. By the time a denial pattern is visible in a monthly report, the practice has already lost 4–6 weeks of revenue.
Vizier's revenue cycle dashboards update every time billing data is uploaded — which means a spike in CO-97 denials from a specific payer is visible in week two, not at month-end when it's too late to address it in the same billing cycle.
We configure revenue cycle analytics using the same denial reason code taxonomy your billing team already uses. The dashboard speaks the language of your revenue cycle staff — not a translation that requires cross-referencing with your billing system.
The Level 3 to Level 4 Coding Opportunity
The average physician group leaves $150,000 per year in Level 4 (99214) billing on the table by defaulting to Level 3 (99213). The documentation for a Level 4 visit exists — the clinical encounter was complex enough — but the code wasn't selected because providers habitually bill conservatively or documentation doesn't capture what was actually done.
Vizier's coding gap analysis compares your visit-level E/M code distribution against national benchmarks for your specialty. When your 99213 rate is 20 points above specialty average and your 99214 rate is correspondingly low, the gap analysis quantifies the revenue at risk and identifies which providers and visit types show the largest discrepancy.
This isn't about upcoding — it's about ensuring that documentation specificity matches visit complexity. When documentation supports Level 4, the claim should reflect it. The coding gap report tells you where documentation improvement training would have the most immediate revenue impact.
Not All Payers Are Created Equal — See the Data
Revenue Cycle Visibility That Updates With Every Billing Export
Revenue cycle analytics in Vizier don't require a full-time analyst to maintain. The billing team uploads the monthly export, Vizier calculates updated denial rates and payer performance, and the report is ready for the weekly revenue cycle meeting without anyone compiling spreadsheets.
The configuration is done by consultants who know the difference between a CO-97 and a CO-4 denial, understand why prior auth burden should be measured per procedure category rather than in aggregate, and can help your billing staff interpret what the data is telling them — not just show them a chart.
From Denial Audit to Ongoing Revenue Cycle Monitoring
What to Expect and When
Revenue cycle configuration typically takes four weeks. The most time-sensitive deliverable is the coding gap analysis — most practices that have it run for the first time identify revenue recovery opportunities that pay for the engagement cost within a single billing cycle.
See Your Denial Rate and Coding Gap in the First Session
Schedule a 30-minute consultation. Bring three months of billing data and we'll calculate your baseline denial rate, identify the top three reason code patterns, and estimate the coding gap opportunity before any engagement begins.